Re: Replacement to ticks for signals
| From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith | Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:55:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Replacement to ticks for signals | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-39437@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 29.07.2008, at 16:40, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 29.07.2008 18:28, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:Then go ahead and commit according to the notes by Tony. We will then keep the deprecation flags as is in HEAD and 5.3. Could you also update the http://wiki.php.net/doc/scratchpad/upgrade/53 page? regards, Lukas Kahwe Smith mls@pooteeweet.orgCould you separate the ticks/dispatch patch from the new functions, please? I just think they are two separate things and therefore should committed in two steps. Other than that, I don't have any objections.I added pcntl_sigwaitinfo(), pcntl_sigtimedwait() and pcntl_sigprocmask() to my patch: http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/pcntl.patch pcntl_sigwaitinfo() allows to block until the specified signals have been delivered. pcntl_sigtimedwait() does the same thing, but with a timeout. pcntl_sigprocmask() allows to block a set of signals so that they will notbedelivered between two calls of the above functions.Lukas, Johannes, can I ? (As this is to give an alternative to a deprecated feature).