Re: Replacement to ticks for signals
| From: | Arnaud Le Blanc | Date: | Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:31:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Replacement to ticks for signals | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-39439@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 16:40:03 Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 29.07.2008 18:28, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
> >> I added pcntl_sigwaitinfo(), pcntl_sigtimedwait() and pcntl_sigprocmask()
to
> >> my patch:
> >>
> >> http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/pcntl.patch
> >>
> >> pcntl_sigwaitinfo() allows to block until the specified signals have been
> >> delivered.
> >> pcntl_sigtimedwait() does the same thing, but with a timeout.
> >> pcntl_sigprocmask() allows to block a set of signals so that they will
not
> > be
> >> delivered between two calls of the above functions.
> >
> > Lukas, Johannes, can I ? (As this is to give an alternative to a
deprecated
> > feature).
>
> Could you separate the ticks/dispatch patch from the new functions, please?
> I just think they are two separate things and therefore should committed in
two steps.
> Other than that, I don't have any objections.
>
> --
> Wbr,
> Antony Dovgal
>
Yes, no problem, I will commit them separately :)