Re: Re: variable_exists() patch

From: Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 19:33:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: variable_exists() patch
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-3954@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Actually isset() doesn't behave as it should: $foo = null; echo isset( $foo ); In the above it should return true, but doesn't because it considers null to be not set. Thus it is flawed since I explicitly set it to null. Understandably this is documented; however, the issue here is whether a variable_exists() function should be added -- for which I am +1 for adding it :) Cheers, Rob. On Thu, 2003-08-14 at 15:30, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > On August 14, 2003 03:11 pm, walt boring wrote: > > exactly why isset() is either > > 1) a bad name for the function or > > 2) 'broken' > > Wrong. isset() has a very proper name "is-set", which to me and other people > says that it will see if a variable is set (has a value). It does this job > admirably and it certainly not broken. Documentation specifies how this > function will perform perfectly. > > Ilia > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- .---------------------------------------------. | Worlds of Carnage - http://www.wocmud.org | :---------------------------------------------: | Come visit a world of myth and legend where | | fantastical creatures come to life and the | | stuff of nightmares grasp for your soul. | `---------------------------------------------'

« previous php.internals (#3954) next »