Re: Inconsistencies in 5.3

Hello everybody, Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 03:04 +0200 schrieb Etienne Kneuss: [...] > To me > > namespace A { > code > } > > namespace B { > code > } > > code > > seems equivalent to > > namespace A; > code > namespace B; > code > namespace <none>; > code > > Only nicer. And I can hardly how it's going to cause more problems? > But if that's so, fine. [...] Just one thing: we developed around 50.000 lines of code with the current namespace syntax and it was neither confusing nor inconsistent to use. I'm very happy with the current syntax and I would like to just leave it as it is. Also I'm really against the curly braces: the issue is, that we would indent the single class in the file then as otherwise the sense of braces would be caricatured: we indent to make sure we can easily distinguish control structures. But if we indent the content of a namespace, we will have less characters until the magic 80-100 character border and therefore we will have linebreaks in conditions which makes them hard to read. cu, Lars

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc