Re: true namespaces, yet another point of view

From: Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 07:43:35 +0000
Subject: Re: true namespaces, yet another point of view
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-40659@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Arvids Godjuks a écrit :
Of course that isn't a good example, because Zend framework always has a class prefix "Zend", but they surely can use a namespace and remove that Zend in front of classes.
They are a lot of case where you want to use this syntax. The most common is when you have a depth namespace like a russian puppy : namespace org::w3::xhtml::strict as x ; The other reason is to use it for testing purposes, when you develop a new engine, that share the same API with the previous : // namespace org::w3::xml as xml ; namespace com::lupusmic::xml as xml ; But maybe it isn't a good use... :D Namespaces can be a usefull tool, but if wouldn't, don't use. And if it becomes mandatory, fork your own PHP version :D -- Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis http://lupusmic.org

« previous php.internals (#40659) next »