Re: true namespaces, yet another point of view

From: Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:42:01 +0000
Subject: Re: true namespaces, yet another point of view
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-40669@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
""Steph Fox"" <steph@php.net> wrote in message news:004401c91dd4$85907940$3ffc1f3e@foxbox... >> For those that do not understand very well the explanation of jvlad... > > Guileherme, you are missing the point. We'd all like to see PHP 5.3.0 out > there. It has a lot to offer, but namespace support is very obviously > problematic. That's it, that's all. > > - Steph > Steph, Maybe I'm just missing the idea... to me it looks an attempt to advertize something that does not even exist. Do you think semi-working namespaces with limited support, that does not go beyound classes, will be greatly appreciated by php developers? What if anything can be solved or achieved with namespaces like offered in 5.3alpha? -jv

« previous php.internals (#40669) next »