Re: alpha3

> Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually > quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between > namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added > easily. > Adding support for functions, constants and even variables is actually > quite do-able with the solution I suggested (different separator between > namespace name and function/constant/variable name) and can be added > easily. Greg, Does it mean that the namespace separator will not be (or likely not to be) the same when you need access to namespaced classes vs namespaced functions? What's about consistency of the design? If you can't resolve the ambiguity or any other problems around namespaces without changing the separator, why not to change it for classes too? -JV