Re: namespaces and alpha3

I see the point and objections against "quick and dirty", but on the other hand the discussion about the namespaces started long time ago - two years already? If for two years there wasn't an agreement how they have to be implemented (or even whether to add them at all! because I see many comments in this sense) what are the reasons to think that in the next 5-6 months, when php6 will reach its "release stage" with the first alphas, this will be done? Even the namespaces dont go in php5.3 I think a solution/agreement has to be found quickly because it looks like php 6.0 could be in the same situation after few months. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Ryan Panning <rpanning@gmail.com> wrote: > Jochem Maas wrote: > >> 1) rip them out >>>>>> >>>>> +1 ... I concur with Steph's opinion >> > > Also +1 for taking them out. > > Namespaces should be saved for PHP 6 IMO as well. Now that the current > namespaces have been tested there is at least a starting point for > discussion. And that discussion has started as everyone knows. But I think > that any decisions will not be made for a timely 5.3 release or the "quick > and dirty" option will win. In the long run it needs to be done right, not > in a hurry. > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Vesselin Kenashkov developer at www.webstudiobulgaria.com