Re: my last attempt at sanity with namespaces
| From: | Lars Strojny | Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:11:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: my last attempt at sanity with namespaces | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-41116@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello Greg,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.10.2008, 15:35 -0500 schrieb Greg Beaver:
[...]
> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/namespaceissues
>
> Read it and discuss. Let's be clear people: the technical problems in
> namespaces are limited and solvable. The problems in the political
> environment surrounding them may not be. Wouldn't politics be a
> stupid-ass reason to remove namespaces?
Thanks for your efforts to fixing the remaining small issues with the
current implementation. We wrote 50.000 LOC against 5.3 since half a
year and I have to say the problems are minimal in the real world. But I
understand the issues, especially the way how classnames are resolved
are hard to guess. So +1 for your resolving proposal.
The usage issue is not that easy for as I have a conflict of interests
here: the lazy me votes for option 2 (no change for my code, ugly for
those who use functions, which we don't do anyway), the one who weights
whats best for PHP weights for option 3. So, the heck, let's do option
3, replacing "use Foo::Bar" with "use namespace Foo::Bar" is not that
hard.
Thanks for your solution!
Lars
--
Jabber: lars@strojny.net
Weblog: http://usrportage.de
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil signature.asc