Re: my last attempt at sanity with namespaces
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:19:48 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: my last attempt at sanity with namespaces | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-41150@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
great work - just one little note that may/may not help..
after much more thought I think you're option #2 is actually best however the choice of ":::" separator in the example really confuses things and makes at an instant turn off..
I honestly think that if the option was rewritten as let's say:
one::step:>two()
one:>step::two()
(or indeed any other double-char operator) then it would make a lot more sense, visually, logically and perhaps be the winner here..
Regards and thanks for the massive amount of patience :-)