Re: Sanity tally #2
| From: | Nathan Rixham | Date: | Fri, 17 Oct 2008 02:05:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Sanity tally #2 | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-41191@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Steph Fox wrote:
I was hoping to have at least 30 respondees at this stage, but actually have 29 (and that includes Hannes' abstention). However, to keep y'all up to date, here's where we're up to with Greg's proposals. Option #3 is in the lead, but that lead is still pretty fragile; there are only 3 full votes between #3 and option #1. 'Liveability' - ie whether people could live with an alternative option - is therefore becoming more important now. #4 appears to be out of the running completely, and #2 is a long way behind. If option #3 (or #1) gains a clear lead, we could get it down to two proposals (Stas' versus Greg's) rather than three in the final round. - Stephjust wondering if there are any cut of dates for the tally dates / rounds etc?Name Issue A Issue B======================================================Greg #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes Guilherme #3 Yes Kalle #4 Yes Tony Bibbs #3 Yes Jaroslav Hanslik #1 (alt #3) Yes Nathan Rixham* #2 (DS, alt #1 DS, #4) Yes Liz #1 or #3 Yes Andrei #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes Janusz Lewandowski* #4 (alt #3) Yes Steph #3 (alt #2) Abstained Josh Davies #2 (DS) Yes Hannes Abstained Abstained Lester #3 N/A Alexey #3 Yes Marc Boeren #1 (DS) N/A Derick #1 No Vesselin Kenashkov #3 Yes Lars* #3 (alt #1) N/A Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3) Yes Jochem Maas #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes Richard Quadling #1 (alt #2) No Justin Carlson #3 N/A James Dempster #1 Yes Christian Schneider #3 N/A Ben Ramsey #3 N/A Ron Rademaker #3 N/A Luke Richards #1 Yes Stas #3 No Geoffry Sneddon #1 Yesname* = corrected/altered/clarified initial voteDS = 'with different separator'Issue A: #1 - 14 (2 with different separator) #2 - 8 (2 with different separator) #3 - 19 #4 - 3 Abs- 1 Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1): #1 - 18 + 5 = 23 #2 - 10 + 3 = 13 #3 - 24 + 7 = 31 #4 - 4 + 1 = 5 Abs - 2 + 0 = 2 = 58/2 = 29 people Issue B: Yes - 17 No - 3 (see Richard and Stas' arguments) Abs - 2 N/A - 7 = 29 people