RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
| From: | Catalin Zamfir Alexandru | KIT Software CAZ | Date: | Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:49:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-41260@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I'm with Keryx. Although I work as a subcontractor for our main company, I
still have to teach some novice PHP programmers what this whole OOP paradigm
is all about, and making them go furter from the third solution that is C++
like, is a pain in the back. I'm in for readable/maintainable code.
Josh, anyway, Steph did a great job with EVERY developer, asking each and
every one why they've chosen. I thinks this thread is almost over now. The
results of the poll should be cristal-clear ...
----------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Davis [mailto:phpwnd@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 9:41 PM
> To: Daniel Brown
> Cc: Keryx Web; internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
>
> 2008/10/18 Daniel Brown <parasane@gmail.com>:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <phpwnd@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <webmaster@keryx.se>:
> >>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare -
> yes in
> >>> both suggestions.
> >>
> >> Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read?
> >
> > Is that a problem?
>
> I'm trying to make some sense out of that poll's results, I'm not
> implying anything. Poll numbers are not that useful if you don't
> figure out why people voted the way they did.
>
> That wouldn't be the right thread to discuss the merits of a solution,
> anyway. This thread is about the tally, and I'm trying to interpret
> it.
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php