RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2

From: Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:49:46 +0000
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-41260@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I'm with Keryx. Although I work as a subcontractor for our main company, I still have to teach some novice PHP programmers what this whole OOP paradigm is all about, and making them go furter from the third solution that is C++ like, is a pain in the back. I'm in for readable/maintainable code. Josh, anyway, Steph did a great job with EVERY developer, asking each and every one why they've chosen. I thinks this thread is almost over now. The results of the poll should be cristal-clear ... ---------------------------- > -----Original Message----- > From: Josh Davis [mailto:phpwnd@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 9:41 PM > To: Daniel Brown > Cc: Keryx Web; internals@lists.php.net > Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Sanity tally #2 > > 2008/10/18 Daniel Brown <parasane@gmail.com>: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Josh Davis <phpwnd@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2008/10/18 Keryx Web <webmaster@keryx.se>: > >>> Triple colon as in suggestion 1 and 2 is a readability nightmare - > yes in > >>> both suggestions. > >> > >> Is that why you voted for 3? Because triple colons are hard to read? > > > > Is that a problem? > > I'm trying to make some sense out of that poll's results, I'm not > implying anything. Poll numbers are not that useful if you don't > figure out why people voted the way they did. > > That wouldn't be the right thread to discuss the merits of a solution, > anyway. This thread is about the tally, and I'm trying to interpret > it. > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

« previous php.internals (#41260) next »