Re: Restructuring the QA team
| From: | Ronald Chmara | Date: | Mon, 03 Nov 2008 08:08:00 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Restructuring the QA team | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals php.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-41619@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:16 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hannes Magnusson schrieb:Who recommends (and how do they recommend) credit for PHP core? Who recommends (and how do they recommend) credit for PHP extensions? Who recommends (and how do they recommend) credit for PHP documentation? Who recommends (and how do they recommend) credit for PHP notes? Who recommends (and how do they recommend) credit for PHP QA? One thing that does bother me about Hannes's suggestion is the implication that somebody who worked on PHP for 3 years is less important than somebody who worked on PHP for a year or so, but they did so *very recently*. We all stand on the shoulders of others. +1 on adding names. -1 on removing names. The PHP project has 2,000+ authors. Some are well known "rockstars", others are virtually unknown. -BopSpeaking of "QA people", how about crediting those who are actually working on QA and removing the names who haven't been around for years (I don't even recognized most of those names)?How do you recommend measuring who deserves credit?