Re: New function proposal: spl_object_id

Hello, On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Lars Strojny <lars@strojny.net> wrote: > Hi Guilherme, > > thanks for moving the discussion to the list. > > Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2008, 15:31 -0200 schrieb Guilherme Blanco: > [...] >> It seems that Marcus controls the commit access to SPL. So I'm turning >> the conversation async, since I cannot find him online at IRC. >> So, can anyone review the patch, comment it and commit if approved? > > Just for clarification, it is not about access, but about maintenance. > So if Marcus gives his go, we can happily apply the patch and add a few > tests (something you could start preparing now). > > cu, Lars > Last time I checked with Marcus, there were concerns about disclosing a valid pointer to the user. I'd be happy to see a use-case where this information is really needed heavily. The only real usecase of heavy usages seems to be to implement sets of objects. but splObjectStorage is here for that precise use-case... Regards -- Etienne Kneuss http://www.colder.ch Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from a religious conviction. -- Pascal