Re: New function proposal: spl_object_id

Hi Oskar, Yes, you can use a plain array too. I was just giving you a normal approach (ArrayAccess inherited class) because you may want a special behavior under it too. Forget SplObjectStorage docs.... they're outdated.... read the source! =) Undoubtely devs will not mark spl_object_hash a E_DEPRECATED... I'll kill each one if they want to! =P Cheers, On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Oskar Eisemuth <patchnow@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Guilherme > >> The new implementation of spl_object_hash will solve it, since it's a >> faster implementation than the old one. >> Just one hint, you should not try to echo the generated hash, since it >> may have non-printable chars. >> > > I don't think that will be a problem... >> >> Also, your code may still be possible to use SplObjectStorage. >> Etienne did a lot of research regarding how it could be used, and he >> showed me that a n-dimensional array is possible too. >> >> In your situation, $events should be an ArrayAccess instance, while >> each $events[$event] should be an SplObjectStorage. >> > > May I ask why your sample uses ArrayAccess instead of a plain array()? And > ArrayAccess is an Interface, now I am bit puzzled. > > SplObjectStorage will only allow objects (Docs?), I register static classes > as event listener, so something like this won't work: > > EVENT::register("myevent", "Autoloader", "onmyevent"); // > Register > Autoloader::onmyevent() as event listener. > > A reason I wrote SplObjectStorage won't solve my usage of spl_object_hash.. > > So don't mark spl_object_hash deprecated in 5.4 ;-) > > Best regards > Oskar Eisemuth > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com URL: http://blog.bisna.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil