Re: Is there a technical reason <?= considered a "short tag"?
| From: | Stanislav Malyshev | Date: | Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:58:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is there a technical reason <?= considered a "short tag"? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-44172@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
Right, I think that is actually the conclusion we came to at one point. I don't remember the discussion that caused the RFC to be declined. I would be in favour of reversing that decision wherever it came from.Amen to that!
And that just isn't going to happen. The only valid argument against short_tags itself is that it clashes with named PI tags and <?= does not have that same problem.So, could we have <?= reclassified as "normal tag" and have short_tags killed for 6? Please? :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com