Re: Is there a technical reason <?= considered a "short tag"?
| From: | Stanislav Malyshev | Date: | Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:05:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Is there a technical reason <?= considered a "short tag"? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-44191@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
No, #1 in your list is why people got sick of it. You want to bind the decoupling of <?= as a short tag to the removal of short tags. They are two different issues.I do not insist on 1. I'd be ok with not touching short tags but just moving <?= to non-short. I just think once <?= is non-short, nobody needs short tags anymore, but I could be wrong. We may do it in 2 steps. We might even have <?= made non-short in 5.3 maybe :)
The only change I care to see is that <?= is always valid. That wouldSame here. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com