Re: Design of the Zend Engine's Instruction Set

Pierre Joye wrote:

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Lothar Scholz<scholz@scriptolutions.com> wrote:

Hello Stanislav, Monday, August 17, 2009, 9:46:19 AM, you wrote: SM> Hi!

A buggy implementation should solve as reference? Damn'd fucking college boys. This was an acceptable development method for PHP3.

SM> So, you came to PHP developers list to call people names and whine about SM> how the thing mostly done by volunteers and used by millions sucks? If they are doing bad - yes i do. I have to say i give a fuck about volunteers - most of them should go to hell because most of them are worse to projects and they should/would go better without them and with a strict core team. If you base a project only on volunteers its just digital environment pollution - and you should be punished for putting it out.

I would suggest to fix your language too. You may also read about open source software developments, how it works, where it came from, etc. It could help you to do not pollute our list with pointless (and respectless) mails.

Something that we can agree on Pierre! I much prefer working with 'volunteers' that '9to5 clock watchers' ... -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/ Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk// Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php