Re: Re: function call chaining
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:02:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: function call chaining | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-46809@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Eddie Drapkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com> wrote:
>> The second was next on my list, while the first seems to me kind of exotic -
>> why create object only to call one method and immediately drop it? Why this
>> method is not static then?
>
>
> Why would this imply "dropping" the object?
>
> This:
> $foo = (new bar())->someSetter();
> Looks a lot better than this
> $foo = new bar();
> $foo->someSetter();
The second version is much clearer. You know exactly what $foo is. In
the shortened version you have no idea what $foo is without reading the
code for the someSetter() method. On first glance I would assume that
$foo would be the success/failure return of the setter and that the
object is dropped.
-Rasmus