Re: variables in namespaces, was: On closures and lamdba
| From: | Alain Williams | Date: | Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:11:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: variables in namespaces, was: On closures and lamdba | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-47050@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 02:20:38PM +0300, Alexey Zakhlestin wrote:
>
> On 24.02.2010, at 13:28, Alain Williams wrote:
> > Objects are not always the answer.
>
> in situation, which you described, objects are definitely the answer.
> you have several functions, which share the same "state". that's very close to
> the definition of object.
Maybe 'private static' -- ie shared between different objects.
It is not always appropriate, eg a generic logging function, called from all over
the place - it is not always convenient to pass a logging object around;
you just want to call the logging function.
OO is not always the answer.
--
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256 http://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: http://www.phcomp.co.uk/contact.php
Past chairman of UKUUG: http://www.ukuug.org/
#include <std_disclaimer.h>