Re: Re: moving forward
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:42:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: moving forward | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-47275@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
(g)it would be better for cherrypicking and handling multiple
development branches, but it the developers cant use it propery, the
its PITA.
Tyrael
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Gwynne Raskind <gwynne@darkrainfall.org> wrote:
> On Mar 14, 2010, at 12:58 PM, David Soria Parra wrote:
>>> I would also like to bring up another point. Since we are now on SVN (and there are
>>> nice bridges to DVCS for those that want to use them), we can now also more easily enable developers
>>> to work on complex or risky features in a branch instead of trunk. So for example if we feel like it
>>> will take us too long to come up with a unicode plan, then I would suggest to leave it out the next
>>> release and simply have the people that have an idea for an approach create a branch and work things
>>> out there. This way normal development in trunk can commence.
>> Yes experimental branching shouldn't be a problem. I persoanlly would prefer if we
>> just create php-src/experimental/ or php-src/developer/<name>/<branch> for this purpuse
>> to not clutter branches/ with a million names.
>
>
> I'd actually like to bring up the question of going to DVCS for PHP. I know I was a vocal
> advocate against it before, but I've learned a bit since then. Anyone care to discuss?
>
> -- Gwynne
>
>