Re: Re: moving forward

> Oh no .. another dangerous topic. Again we have been there even before the switch. The idea is > to keep the centralized repo on svn, because the masses know how it works, the tools are widely > available and we have plenty of experience among us in how to keep svn running. I see little > incentive to move the _central_ repo to a DVCS. Are the bridges to git, mercurial, bzaar etc really > so bad that this topic is worth discussing (no sarcasm, honest question)? I only have experience with git. The problem with something like git-svn is that your git branch becomes an island. I can't share that branch with anyone else. So all I really get is git syntax within an svn environment. I have no problem working with svn and actually prefer it for projects that use a compiler. For PHP apps, git is great because nothing has to be built. Bouncing between git branches means I have to recompile PHP every time (or set up some system of symlinks). -- Herman Radtke hermanradtke@gmail.com | http://hermanradtke.com