Re: On constructors: BC Break and Class compiler Improvements

Hi! So, I think we've got consensus about not having class-named ctors in namespaced classes in trunk, and unless I hear some screams I'll commit the patch early next week. What about the 5.3? (BTW, I don't see any difference between 5.3.0 and anything later, could anybody point it to me?) We could: 1. Kill the class-named ctors for NS in 5.3 (some BC break, though I have hard time believing anybody used it so far, but who knows) 2. Kill the warning and just ignore the other one if __ctor is there. 3. Leave everything as-is. I kind of favor (1) but want to hear from people here and esp. RMs :) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/ (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com