Re: On constructors: BC Break and Class compiler Improvements
| From: | Ferenc Kovacs | Date: | Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:52:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: On constructors: BC Break and Class compiler Improvements | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-47804@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Hannes Magnusson <hannes.magnusson@gmail.com
> wrote:
> 2010/4/6 Richard Quadling <rquadling@googlemail.com>:
> > 2010/4/5 Stanislav Malyshev <stas@zend.com>:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>> Given the feedback on the list I think it's ok.
> >>> Please make the BC break clear in the NEWS file so I remember to copy
> it
> >>> in the announcement.
> >>
> >> OK, done.
> >> --
> >> Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
> >> stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
> >> (408)253-8829 MSN: stas@zend.com
> >>
> >> --
> >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I've just done a quick check on PEAR/packages-all with regard to
> > classes using __construct vs the class name.
> >
> > 818 classes have __construct
> > 1511 use the class name as the constructor
> > 3563 files don't have a constructor
> >
> > I excluded tests, examples and documentation (but some may have crept
> in).
> >
>
> None of those use namespaces, so there is no break there.
>
> -Hannes
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
> should we check pear2?
Tyrael