Re: back to 5.4 alpha

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: >> >> +1, I think that's the most sensible solution for now that would allow >> us to proceed with 5.4, something we all seem to be in agreement on. > > A slight aside here, as I have not be bothering about what HAS been > implemented typing wise ... A large section of the code a work with passes a > range of data to functions and classes. If the function gets an integer it > looks up the record with that id, an array assumes the data is already > loaded, and perhaps a string value defines that a new record of that name is > to be created. So I don't want the parameters passed to be tied to a single > type. Is THAT affected by any of the current typing actions? both suggested type-hinting strategies are optional. so, you, as developer, are free to not use type-hinting and accept any data you like -- Alexey Zakhlestin http://www.milkfarmsoft.com/