Re: Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch
| From: | Christian Kaps | Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:32:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49694@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
it's reserved for the error control
operator(http://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.errorcontrol.php).
Greetings,
Christian
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 11:26:51 +0300, Aleksei Sapunov <saprizo@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello all,
> Only today see that here is very intersting discussion.
> I have a question: why was choosed exactly this format (seems like c#-like,
> not java-like)?
> Simply [] is used for arrays. Why not use @ at annotation name?
>
> 2010/9/16 Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Arvids Godjuks
>> <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > P.S. Personally I would take the energy boiling in this thread and
>> > throw it at solving the windows biuld and PECL problem. Right now you
>> > can't install PHP 5.2 and apache on a Windows 7 - it just crashes
>> > totally.
>>
>> Where are the bugs report?
>>
>> > Only 5.3 works, not to mention much of the PECL libs just
>> > don't have dll's (lucky if you find one in the Google). The same goes
>> > for the PECL dll's for 5.3 - all of them, excluding the standard once,
>> > mostly are missing and can't be found at all.
>>
>> What are you talking about? Not a real question, use bugs.php.net for
>> php extensions, if something is broken or missing.
>>
>> Thanks to focus on the topic and not hi jack this thread with random rants.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Pierre
>>
>> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
>> http://www.libgd.org
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>