Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:57:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49702@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Zeev Suraski wrote:
> I'm not sure we've seen a good reason to add annotations instead of using
> PHPDoc. Sure, PHPDoc isn't a perfect fit for certain purposes, but I think it
> certainly falls in the good-enough fit for most purposes. It's also both
> machine and human readable, and best of all - it's already there.
There is even a tokenizing extension for it in PECL:
http://pecl.php.net/docblock
> There should be overwhelmingly strong reasons to add a whole new branch of
> syntax to PHP, I for one don't see the huge gain annotations bring on top of
> PHPDoc.
The only thing I can think of is added the storing of docblock data for
class methods and class properties. Right now I think they're not being
stored in the oparrays? In any case, I am also not for adding more
syntax just to do annotations.
cheers,
Derick
--
http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug