Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch
| From: | Gustavo Lopes | Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:16:01 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP Annotations RFC + Patch | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49703@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:57:01 +0100, Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
Have you read my e-mail? http://news.php.net/php.internals/49674 I don't understand whether you're against annotations per se or if using doc comments to implement annotations would be okay. As I said, doc comments as they are now are insufficient. -- Gustavo LopesThere should be overwhelmingly strong reasons to add a whole new branch of syntax to PHP, I for one don't see the huge gain annotations bring on top of PHPDoc.The only thing I can think of is added the storing of docblock data for class methods and class properties. Right now I think they're not being stored in the oparrays? In any case, I am also not for adding more syntax just to do annotations.