Re: Skipping of defaulted parameters.

From: Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:56:41 +0000
Subject: Re: Skipping of defaulted parameters.
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-49952@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On 21 October 2010 11:45, Ionut G. Stan <ionut.g.stan@gmail.com> wrote: > On 21/Oct/10 1:17 PM, Richard Quadling wrote: >> >> On 21 October 2010 08:52, Ionut G. Stan<ionut.g.stan@gmail.com>  wrote: >>> >>> Option 5: Implement named parameters? >>> >> >> Come on, play fair. I know all about the named parameters and I didn't >> mention them. > > Where's the unfairness? I proposed them because the issue you raised is a > perfectly valid reason to introduce named parameters. IMO. Because for the last few days, named parameters have been discussed. Again. And with the same result. Not yet (and maybe not ever) for PHP. -- Richard Quadling Twitter : EE : Zend @RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY

« previous php.internals (#49952) next »