Re: Skipping of defaulted parameters.
| From: | Pas | Date: | Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:31:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Skipping of defaulted parameters. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-49955@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 2010.10.21. 12:56, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 21 October 2010 11:45, Ionut G. Stan<ionut.g.stan@gmail.com> wrote:Because for the last few days, named parameters have been discussed. Again. And with the same result. Not yet (and maybe not ever) for PHP. This wasn't a real discussion. Most of the contra-replies were of the "RTFM and no" kind. The last reference ( www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#named-parameters ) doesn't explain either. (It just says it'd violate PHP's KISS principle. But function calls with a ton of NULLs or array parsing isn't exactly simple either.) Although, there aren't any RFCs for the feature, so maybe you're right, there's nothing to discuss. PasOn 21/Oct/10 1:17 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:Where's the unfairness? I proposed them because the issue you raised is a perfectly valid reason to introduce named parameters. IMO.Come on, play fair. I know all about the named parameters and I didn't mention them.On 21 October 2010 08:52, Ionut G. Stan<ionut.g.stan@gmail.com> wrote:Option 5: Implement named parameters?