Re: [alexander.schrijver@gmail.com: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON]
| From: | Alexander Schrijver | Date: | Mon, 01 Nov 2010 12:43:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [alexander.schrijver@gmail.com: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: [SPAM] Re: [PHP-DEV] rename T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM to T_DOUBLE_COLON] | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-50054@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:36:24PM +0100, Etienne Kneuss wrote:
> > It's the policy:
> > > There are two reasons this term will stay. It is a tip of the hat to
> > > the amount of PHP work that came out of Israel, and it is a good
> > >
> > > reminder that there are a lot of other languages in the world. People
> > > whose first language is not English, myself included, are forced to work
> > > with unfamiliar terms every day. I wouldn't mind having a few more
> > >
> > > non-English identifiers in PHP actually.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Well, and a third reason, I like it.
> >
> > There is some reason this policy will change after i write this new tokenizer?
>
> Yes, there is a reason:
>
> As it was explained before, lemon would not display token names but
> actual token "values". So instead of "Unexpected T_PAABLAH" it would say
> "Unexpected '::' ..."
But the lesson Rasmus was telling us about would go away. Yet, this is one of
the reasons the token is being kept. I am confused. Are you telling me this is
a lesson for the programmers to be learned? Not for the users?