Re: [RFC] new foo()->bar()

Care should be taken in the case of new myClass()->foo() just creates an object to call a method but a static method would be more efficient here. However, well used (fluent interface for exemple) make me think +1 for that patch. J.Pauli On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > 2010/11/29 Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com> > >>  Hi Felipe, > > >> I'm wondered it works out of the box with so small patches :) >> >> However, both patches introduce new parser conflicts and it would be grate >> to avoid them. >> >> > I will check if there is any way to avoid it. > > >> Also the patches need to be checked for memory leaks in case of exceptions >> thrown from constructor and chained function(s). >> > > Yes, I already did several tests to check this. > > >> It also probably makes sense to add array deference chaining e.g. new >> Foo()[] (just for language consistency). >> >> > Hmm, looks good to me. :) > > > Thanks. > > -- > Regards, > Felipe Pena >