Re: Re: [RFC] new foo()->bar()
| From: | Xinchen Hui | Date: | Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [RFC] new foo()->bar() | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-55829@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Sent from my iPhone
在 2011-10-17，6:03，Felipe Pena <felipensp@gmail.com> 写道：
> Hi,
>
> 2011/10/7 Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>:
>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Michael Wallner <mike@php.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2010 08:36 PM, Felipe Pena wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Other examples which describes the feature at
>>>> http://wiki.php.net/rfc/instance-method-call
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Finally.
>>
>> it seems that it didn't made it to the trunk/5.4.
>> is there anything holding things back? I think Dmitry mentioned
>> checking for memleaks and such, but I didn't remember seeing anybody
>> really against the idea.
>>
>
> There is no memleak from what I've tested. I only haven't a way to
> prevent the 1 shift/reduce conflict
yes，that was the problem I encountered too. If we set "%expect 3 " and
let bison deal with it, it could works as expect. But obvious not the
best solution. :)
> added by the patch, which seems
> harmless for our grammar though.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Felipe Pena
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>