Re: Final version, RFC release process
| From: | Peter Lind | Date: | Thu, 02 Jun 2011 11:01:23 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Final version, RFC release process | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52753@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 2 June 2011 12:40, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
*snip*
>
> No, it is the same that what we proposed. What we proposed is that
> every release is actually a LTS release. What Ubuntu uses works fine
> for distros given that it is a distro with an insane amount of totally
> unrelated projects they distribute, and alternative repositories exist
> for almost each of them.
>
> For a programming language, it is a totally different story.
>
That makes more sense - you were, however, arguing against random LTS
releases which was rather confusing (there's a big difference between
"every release is an LTS" and "all LTS releases are random" - those
are not the only options).
Regards
Peter
--
<hype>
WWW: plphp.dk / plind.dk
LinkedIn: plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: kafe15
</hype>