Re: Final version, RFC release process

On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Peter Lind <peter.e.lind@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 June 2011 12:40, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote: > > *snip* > >> >> No, it is the same that what we proposed. What we proposed is that >> every release is actually a LTS release. What Ubuntu uses works fine >> for distros given that it is a distro with an insane amount of totally >> unrelated projects they distribute, and alternative repositories exist >> for almost each of them. >> >> For a programming language, it is a totally different story. >> > > That makes more sense - you were, however, arguing against random LTS > releases which was rather confusing (there's a big difference between > "every release is an LTS" and "all LTS releases are random" - those > are not the only options). The randomness is about which release-features tuples would become a LTS, that's something that can't apply well to a project like php. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org