Re: Bundling "modern" extensions
| From: | Philip Olson | Date: | Sun, 05 Jun 2011 01:09:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Bundling "modern" extensions | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-52905@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jun 4, 2011, at 6:00 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 09:03 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> In parallel I'd also see if there are any key extensions which we
>>>> think are mainstream, stable and well maintained enough to be
>>>> included. For example, http comes to mind.
>>>
>>> Maybe also oauth? It's getting popular and widely used.
>>
>> OAuth is basically outdated now, OAuth2 is going through the final IETF certification
>> steps. No real technical changes in the last few drafts.
>
> And OAuth2 is simple enough that an extension really isn't needed for
> it. OAuth1 was painful and the extension helped a lot. But all the
> painful bits that the extension takes care of are gone in OAuth2.
Ideas for how and where to document PHP+OAuth2? Like, should we keep ext/oauth documented as is but
expand it to include plenty of OAuth2 information? That may be confusing... hmmm....
Regards,
Philip