Re: Bundling "modern" extensions

Am 07.06.2011 15:08, schrieb Ferenc Kovacs: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>wrote: > >> >> >> Am 07.06.2011 14:44, schrieb David Muir: >>> On 07/06/11 18:40, Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> there is a reason for example to disallow many functions >>>> on a webserver - so every API has to make sure they >>>> can not be bypassed >>>> >>>> "because we can" is no valid reason for everything because >>>> we can install binary extension as they exist now and >>>> if you can not you are missing the permissions for some >>>> good reasons >>>> >>> >>> So you're saying that PECL, PNI or FFI should should be actively >>> discouraged because of security concerns? >> >> WHERE i said this? >> PECL-Extensions can NOT be enabled by the user >> >> > except if dl is enabled of course. i think nobody out there will enable this and hope such crazy things are not enabled by default!

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc