Re: Make primitive type names reserved words (Was: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] 5.4 features for vote (long))

hi, As I could agree on this fact, I can't find any existing project having int(eger), float&co as class, namespaced or not. Do you have any example at hand? Cheers, On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 6:41 PM, Patrick ALLAERT <patrickallaert@php.net> wrote: > 2011/6/17 Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>: > > [snip] > >> 2. Make primitive type names reserved words (in case we ever want some form >> of scalar typing or anything else with scalar types). Using them as >> identifiers would return parse error for now. May have BC implications. > > I am not sure it is a good idea to make them reserved words without a > clear reason for doing so. > > I'm sure some projects have defined classes with those keywords in > some namespace (to ensure they wouldn't conflict with possible PHP > built-in stuff) like in: > > namespace \Types { >    class Int { >        // ... >    } >    class Float { >        // ... >    } >    class String { >        // ... >    } >    // ... > } > > Developer may have taken care of defining them in a specific > namespace, would it be possible to not break their application while > making them reserved keywords in the global namespace only? > > I would be +1 if this could be done for the global namespace only. > However, -1 if this would break the usage of classes like \Types\Int, > \Types\String, ... would break. > > Please, rethink your vote taking this into account. I don't think it > is required to hurry up on that decision while we still don't have a > *clear* proposition for scalar type hinting. > > Cheers, > Patrick > > [snip] > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org