Re: Subverting OpenSSL library function with Windows alternatives

From: Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:54:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Subverting OpenSSL library function with Windows alternatives
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-54094@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Scott, On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net> wrote: > Just noticed a commit from Pierre last week > http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=313112 which > changed OpenSSL to use a special Windows API call for gathering random data. > > I've reverted this change so we can discuss this further. There is nothing to discuss. The Windows implementation is just as safe and is much faster than the OpenSsl API. > I disagree with advertising a library function and changing it to use something else. > Especially when this is around random data / encryption. The OpenSSL library has been audited > externally, if there is a better alternative then this patch should go upstream rather than being > hacked into PHP. I disagreed with the initial implementation of this function in the 1st place, for many reasons that we discussed back then. But you still applied it. Now I don't want to have windows applications behind yet again slower because of that and this change greatly improve this function. So we keep it. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

« previous php.internals (#54094) next »