Re: Subverting OpenSSL library function with Windows alternatives
| From: | Pierre Joye | Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:56:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Subverting OpenSSL library function with Windows alternatives | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-54095@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
and I will restore it myself right now, to be sure that it will be in
the next releases.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:54 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> Scott,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net> wrote:
>> Just noticed a commit from Pierre last week
>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=313112 which
>> changed OpenSSL to use a special Windows API call for gathering random data.
>>
>> I've reverted this change so we can discuss this further.
>
> There is nothing to discuss. The Windows implementation is just as
> safe and is much faster than the OpenSsl API.
>
>> I disagree with advertising a library function and changing it to use something else.
>> Especially when this is around random data / encryption. The OpenSSL library has been audited
>> externally, if there is a better alternative then this patch should go upstream rather than being
>> hacked into PHP.
>
> I disagreed with the initial implementation of this function in the
> 1st place, for many reasons that we discussed back then. But you still
> applied it. Now I don't want to have windows applications behind yet
> again slower because of that and this change greatly improve this
> function. So we keep it.
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Pierre
>
> @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net |
> http://www.libgd.org
>
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org