Re: Re: is_a() - again - a better fix
| From: | Rasmus Lerdorf | Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:33:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: is_a() - again - a better fix | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-55619@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 09/23/2011 08:20 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 09/23/2011 11:17 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
>> On 09/23/2011 07:13 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/23/2011 09:15 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:
>>>
>>>> I could also see this being an interesting peer-pressure move -- "First
>>>> to test!", "We tested last week; how come _you_ haven't?", etc.
>>>
>>> Speaking of testing, the commit
>>>
>>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=317183
>>> doesn't have any...
>>>
>>> Who amongst the vocal supporters of the change is volunteering for this
>>> task?
>>
>> I committed a test about 2 hours before you posted this message:
>>
>> http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=317208
>>
>> -Rasmus
>
> I don't see is_a or is_subclass_of in that test. Did I miss something?
Yeah, got the wrong commit when I brought up that link. Had a cached
copy of my fix for 55767 and the wifi is wonky here.