Re: Re: is_a() - again - a better fix
| From: | Christopher Jones | Date: | Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:38:25 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: is_a() - again - a better fix | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-55620@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 09/23/2011 11:33 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On 09/23/2011 08:20 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:No probs. Let's see if the people who speak about PHP & testing & compatibility actually do care enough about it to submit some tests. Chris -- Email: christopher.jones@oracle.com Tel: +1 650 506 8630 Blog: http://blogs.oracle.com/opal/On 09/23/2011 11:17 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:Yeah, got the wrong commit when I brought up that link. Had a cached copy of my fix for 55767 and the wifi is wonky here.On 09/23/2011 07:13 PM, Christopher Jones wrote:I don't see is_a or is_subclass_of in that test. Did I miss something?On 09/23/2011 09:15 AM, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote:I committed a test about 2 hours before you posted this message: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=317208 -RasmusI could also see this being an interesting peer-pressure move -- "First to test!", "We tested last week; how come _you_ haven't?", etc.Speaking of testing, the commit http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=317183 doesn't have any... Who amongst the vocal supporters of the change is volunteering for this task?