Re: who can vote
| From: | Anthony Ferrara | Date: | Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:54:51 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: who can vote | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-56248@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ronald,
Very well said. Thanks for the clarification.
Anthony
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Ronald Chmara <ronabop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmaxell@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> However, and it is what we approved, OSS project leads have a voice,
>>> today and here. And they are not random people, they know sometimes
>>> much better than us what should be added to the core (be language, or
>>> functions in an extension like spl).
>> Well, I would like to make a point here. Right now, and the
>> discussion here is that people who contribute to the core and OSS
>> project leads get a say in the language. What would happen if Google
>> chose to use PHP instead of Python. Would they get a voice? Should
>> they get a voice? (even if it's just a single vote)...? What about
>> professional lead/senior developers who use and develop large and high
>> traffic sites off the language? What about the sysadmins and/or OS
>> package maintainers who implement and maintain the language for mass
>> adoption? What about the individual hosts that contribute so much to
>> the traction and adoption of PHP as a whole? Do any of them get a
>> say?
>
> All of these people do have a voice, and some weight, what they do not
> have is *equal* weight, or an *equal* vote (if any vote at all).
>
> Once a php contributor has become familiar with the different players,
> and who, and what, they represent, they can selectively evaluate
> individual arguments based on their weight. Without naming (outing?)
> specific user names, I can say that no less than three of the top ten
> websites (on the planet) have voices, and representation, in the
> various arguments and discussions here. The largest install bases of
> the most popular PHP applications also carry weight here. Same with
> frameworks, cross-compilers, etc.
>
> There is also the weight, and arguments, of users who have hundreds,
> or even just one (with low traffic), website/project based on php...
> but their arguments are often far outweighed by the arguments of those
> who represent the needs of thousands, or millions, of websites and
> users.
>
> -Ronabop
>