Re: Move old (or non-mainstream) extensions to PECL before beta 3

I think the point in moving them to PECL is to make people realize that they are not supported. :) --Jani p.s. Can someone PLEASE nuke ext/db finally?! On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Wez Furlong wrote: >The point is that there is no need to waste time moving >things around if there is no build infrastructure in place. >Having these extensions in php-src/ext is no different to >having them in pecl/ except that they currently build under >ext, but would require work to make them build under pecl. > >They are not hurting anyone where they are, so I suggest >that it would be better to put the effort into the distro >building script first, and then (if you're bored ;-) move >these not-so-golden extensions into pecl. > >--Wez. > >> Maybe we should move extensions like dbase, ovrimos, ingress_ii, qtdom & >> pfpro to PECL before releasing beta 3 ? >> >> Wez said, on IRC, that we need a script to pick out the "golden" >extensions >> for bundling, but Ilia pointed out that there's nothing golden about a few >of >> these. >> -- >> Caution: breathing may be hazardous to your health. > >Especially at PHP conferences in germany ;-) > >