Re: Move old (or non-mainstream) extensions to PECL before beta 3

Hello Derick, Sunday, November 30, 2003, 1:39:36 PM, you wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Marcus Boerger wrote: >> Hello Wez, >> >> Sunday, November 30, 2003, 11:01:51 AM, you wrote: >> >> > There is no point moving unmaintained code from ext to pecl; >> > its just a waste of time until we can solve the problem at >> > packaging time, which is why I'm suggesting that one of the build >> > guru's that hates these unmaintained extensions *cough* Jani >> > *cough* should work on the distro building tool which we >> > will need real soon now anyway. ;-) >> >> Why not go with RPM's then? The eays way is to split up the RPM's so that we >> can have RPMs for the basic stuff like INI, Docs and all, then for the >> different sapis and then for all the extensions. See attached makerpm for >> current state of work. > How do RPMs work on Gentoo, Debian, Windows, MacOSX...? It is impossible to find a solution that works for all systems. This RPM stuff at least is a way for all *nix systems. So the main problem is Windows again. -- Best regards, Marcus mailto:helly@php.net