Re: consider reverting E_ALL with E_STRICT

Am 06.03.2012 17:22, schrieb Gustavo Lopes: > On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 17:08:07 +0100, Alan Knowles <alan@akbkhome.com> wrote: > >> [...] >> However with E_STRICT included we have to run around and find all the code, and change it >> to stuff like this: >> >> error_reporting(E_ALL & E_STRICT ? E_ALL ^ E_STRICT : E_ALL); >> >> Could we please revert that, and if people want an all encompasing error mode, call it >> E_ANAL, like it was >> supposed to be... > > Whatever the merits, this change was discussed and approved unanimously with 58 votes in favor > (see > https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54/vote ). > There would have to be a very compelling reason to revert this change, especially in a minor > version. there is no single reason to revert this bugfix the bugs were in PHP < 5.4 where ALL WAS NOT ALL which is not really smart the word ALL has a very clear definition

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc