Re: consider reverting E_ALL with E_STRICT

From: Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 09:49:05 +0000
Subject: Re: consider reverting E_ALL with E_STRICT
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-58726@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Am 07.03.2012 01:11, schrieb Alan Knowles: > Sorry - top post as I can't reply to all the mails on the thread.. > > - display errors on. > Yes, this is a business decision, 20 servers running upgraded at different times, some have > less maintenance others > have more.. Seriously, the chance of me even bothering to check one of those log files is > pretty slim. However if > the code is producing warning/notices etc. then that is likely hiding a unexpected behavior > that the client will > report as a bug anyway later, so it's proved over many years to be cost effective to have > them display, clients > report problems, and we can fix them.. They kind of like that service.... it takes 10 minutes to write a script running hourly or whatever you want per cron, mailig you the error-log and reset it at the same time what you are doing is gambling that a random user will notify you about warnings not realizing that they mostly not do NEVER rely on a enduser reporting problems where this can be automated especially because php-warnings in the source code often breaks applications by have them in a form-value or in javascript parts, having them in a from-value can easily result in post them finally in a database this is not a business decision, this is poor administration

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature signature.asc
« previous php.internals (#58726) next »