Re: Github Pull Request

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Kris Craig <kris.craig@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:56 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com > >wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > Yeah I know. That doesn't mean I have to like it though lol. ;P > > > > You may like it or not like it, but it's established terminology so > > we're going to use it. Let's not add noise to our lists. > > -- > > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > > > If we don't critically re-examine "established" ideas now and then, who > will? please go with that problem to github, we didn't coined that term, so we can't really fix it for you. > You can disagree with me, but please don't belittle other people's > concerns by dismissing them as "noise." it is noise on this mailing list, as this isn't the place to fix that term, even if you are right. > I raised a legitimate concern that > was not "unworthy" of discussion. Just because I hold a minority viewpoint > doesn't make it any less valid and I stand by my posts. Ironically, your > dismissive comment after the fact only increased the "noise" factor by at > least two more posts. > the thing is that it wasn't your first or second post which regulars would count as noise, so this time somebody mentioned that you shouldn't do that. > > I believe that the majority, including Github, is wrong on this. yeah, but how can you fix that with lecturing people here? > That term > is needlessly confusing in my opinion. I made that point and it didn't > gain any traction, so like I said I'll just have to suck it up and move > on. But if you're going to jump in with a, "We're gonna do it this way so > shut up," then all that's going to do is create animosity and drag this out > since obviously I"m not about to let such a comment go unchallenged. ;P > sigh. > > If you want to keep beating this dead horse, I'm game. Otherwise, all the > arguments have already been made so just let it go. I voiced my concern > and the majority doesn't share it, so that's that. Time to move on. > \o/ -- Ferenc Kovács @Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu