Re: Re: [RFC] skipping optional parameters

Hi! > My one comment, which others have raised, is readability of multiple > commas -- TBH, at first glance it has the appearance of a mistake. I > think those suggesting a keyword such as "default" make a good point in > this regard -- it makes it 100% clear that you want the default value I wouldn't mind default but that means another keyword which means another disruption (default would be pretty common method name, etc.) -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227