RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / CODING_STANDARDS
| From: | Sascha Schumann | Date: | Wed, 03 Dec 2003 15:23:20 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: [PHP-CVS] cvs: php-src / CODING_STANDARDS | ||
| Groups: | php.internals | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-6098@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> Do you think this inconsistency is worth it, even if it turns out that most
> of our bindings turn out to choose studyCaps?
Certainly. And I am pretty sure that many binding authors
will understand why uglyCaps are largely inferior in the area
of comprehension.
> No doubt the non studlyCaps version is easier to read (btw in the studlyCaps
> version the first char should be lowercased). However is this a real
> scenario? How many words will there be in a method name?
I have seen Windows identifiers which are nearly that length. I
don't mind elaborated identifiers, but whatever their length
is, they need to be readable.
- Sascha